![]() Determining Optimal Permutations for Rows The most frequently read characters are to be placed in the middle row for fast access, followed by the top row, then the bottom. Let’s start by grouping all 26 characters into these rows. The letters on modern keyboards make up three rows: the home (middle), top, and bottom rows. This is easily achieved by traversing the text (cleared of non-alphabetical characters) and updating the Markov Chain at every iteration. A Markov Chain, in this case, is a statistical model that maps each character to the frequency of each character that follows it. Our keyboard models need to understand how characters relate to each other in various contexts. Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen (13k lines) However little known the feelings or views of such a man may be on his first entering a neighbourhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds of the surrounding families, that he is considered the rightful property of some one or other of their daughters. sample.txt It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife. ![]() ![]() The method we are using extracts language from a text file. ![]() The sample text accurately represents the extent of the language.ġ.Their existence is also assumed to be negligible. The number, function, and special character keys are not to be repositioned.Hitting keys on the home row is always faster than the top row, and the top row is always faster than the bottom row.To accomplish this task in a reasonable timeframe, let's follow these assumptions: I, for one, do not have infinite computing power. To find the one, true best keyboard layout, one must use brute force: testing every permutation of keys for typing efficiency. More on this later! Necessary Assumptions More generally, this task can be applied to any language or collection of words. Because QWERTY was developed in the 1870’s, I challenged myself to use modern computer science to generate a more optimal keyboard. We further show how to make data layout decisions robust to workload variation by carefully selecting the input of the optimization.Today, the ubiquitous QWERTY keyboard is assumed to be the optimal layout for typing in the English language. Casper deliv- ers up to 2.32× higher throughput for update-intensive workloads and up to 2.14× higher throughput for hybrid workloads. To evaluate this work, we build an in-memory storage engine, Casper, and we show that it outperforms state-of-the-art data layouts of analytical systems for hybrid workloads. We frame these design decisions as an optimization problem that, given workload knowledge and performance requirements, provides an optimal physical layout for the workload at hand. Our approach navigates the possible design space of the physical layout: it organizes each column’s data by determining the number of partitions, their corresponding sizes and ranges, and the amount of buffer space and how it is allocated. We show that for hybrid workloads we can achieve close to one order of magnitude better performance by tailoring the column layout design to the data and query workload. Modern analytical data systems rely on columnar layouts and employ delta stores to inject new data and updates. However, what is usually a good data layout for an update-heavy workload, is not well-suited for a read-mostly one and vice versa. Data-intensive analytical applications need to support both efficient reads and writes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |